NS defaulter Mervyn Tan has a lot to answer for. Enough about the poor man, though. But it does seem to me there's way too much pussyfooting around the issue. Is dodging our nation's NS requirement wrong or not? Now there's talk about a bridge between 'doers' and 'dodgers'.
This isn't the US, where a member of the latter group can become President.
C'mon. Better minds than mine have already explored the issue, but let me just say, well, if patriots aren't born they're made, so why ever not?
Though it definitely isn't wise to declare yourself the one who'll 'fight against Singapore if need be' before serving your NS... heh.
On a side note, it's great that child sex tourism will, in all likelihood, soon be punishable in Singapore. Sex is a gift from God. So are children, to be used and nurtured in the way He intended.
Plus, even if you don't believe in a God who sees it that way, you can plainly tell it's disgusting. But where does our sense of justice at this travesty come from?
Disgusting. If we don't punish our own wayward (and over-libidinous) citizens, who will? As a Government they're responsible for the people they serve; therefore whether these sex fiends are punished is up to us, not anybody else.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment